Chad Ledford

While watching a favorite show of mine (I’ll leave it un-named to save face) I was bombarded by a commercial for weight loss, nothing new. This commercial was followed up by another for weight loss, albeit for dogs (commercial). So then an offbeat idea hit me. If we give dogs the same food every day which has all the vitamins, minerals, etc. that they need to live a healthy life, why can’t we do the same thing for humans?

I know, I wouldn’t want to eat the same thing every day of my life because I’m used to the variety and I like love the taste of food. Although, you have to admit that the idea doesn’t sound too far fetched (see what I did there?). Let’s take a look at a few scenarios and see if we can justify a bag of human food.

You’re a 300lb linebacker and you’ve always had a problem with weight management and over eating. You’ve tried everything in the book from hoodia, acai, and green tea to weight watchers, atkins, etc. and nothing has helped to reach your goal weight of 54lbs. Enter “Human Food 3000″, a revolutionary new meal in a bag. With Human Food 3000 you are given a regimen of portions and a strict schedule to follow to get you to 54lbs in the next 18 months. Similar to Nutrisystem but way more affordable and consistent. Which brings me to my next scenario.

You’re a 94lb full grown man/woman living in a 3rd world country where food is scarce and shoe inserts (PLUG!) are scarcer. Non-profits are able to purchase Human Food 3000 in large quantities for less than the cost of rice and with more nutritional value. If charities are able to provide more needy people with the nutrients they need to survive, who cares if it’s the same flavor and consistency on the pallet?

Hopefully you understand the idea now, a cheap and efficient pellet-form food that has everything humans need to be healthy. So the next question is, who’s going to make it happen? If anyone executes the idea, send me a bag to try!